We hear it all the time at the end of every meeting "we still have X amount of dollars and are financially sound". I'd like to say that the truth is we are financially stagnant, but actually we have less now than what we had three years ago. Meaning we are spending money faster than its coming in. Is it really that bad? Lets look at a safe example:
Lets say there was this general construction company that three years ago had 4.25 million in the bank. This construction business has ten employees and has average monthly earnings of $150k. That is an additional 5.4 million over a three year span. The business should theoretically have 9.65 million but there are three years of salaries to factor in, plus operating expenses (electricity water maintenance etc.) It would look something like:
9,650,000
-2,400,00 ( 3yrs of 10 salaries avg. 800k per year)
-600,000 ( 3yrs operational cost avg. at 16.6k per month)
-1,000,00 (3yrs of building repairs, additions, equipment purchases)
______________
5,600,000
5.6 million Is what you would expect to be remaining. However the construction company only has 3.5 million in the bank . It started with 4.25 million, what happened? Well there was a lot spent on marketing, business travel and charitable donations. Continuing the trend in another nine years, the business would be down an additional 2.25 million leaving only 1.25 million in the bank. Lets say they don't spend a dime on repairs or additions, then they'd be back to 4.25 million but after nine years of inflation that money buys even less. It would be worth about 3.26 million in today's dollars. This construction business is financially moving backwards, not to say what would happen when business slows down. Unless something changes, they wont survive, let alone thrive.